Tuesday, 22 April 2014

Google and Apply Know Where You Are, Maybe


It is common nowadays to depend on the smartphones to track the location. There are various apps using by the society for good purposes. Anyway, how about bad purposes? Have you ever think about it? People make good use of the tracking software located on smartphones smartphone from looking up directions to a hotel to checking the local traffic updates while in route to work. However, they might be unclear that those locations are actually stored in the smartphones. The stored list can be used to send out local ads or be used to target that individual. Hence, everyone must be aware of location-based tracking software.


1.      Location-based tracking is common to all smartphones, for good reason or bad, the popular location-based service company Foursquare has an app so you can check in at various locations to receive discounts, become Mayor, and see who else might be there. DealLeak which aggregates deals from the likes of Groupon and Living Social, needs your location in order to offer local discounts on products and services to you. How many location-based service apps do you have on your smartphone? How often do you use them and why?

 


Frankly speaking, my smartphone does not have much app for location tracking and I seldom have used them. I have three location-based application on my smartphone, that are, Google Maps, GPS and Facebook. Facebook “check in” function is a good app for me to show my happiness with others when I go to somewhere special or events. Sometimes, I can tag my friends in to share the joy or excitement. The GPS and Google Maps are for the convenience to search a location where I never been. However, some places are not updated in the systems which has made me lost in the town few times. Hence, I have made a habit to check the location properly one day before departure. It will help to avoid lost in somewhere similar location place name but totally different locations.

2.      Apple and Google defended their processes by stating that their privacy policies very clearly stated what information would be gathered, how that information would be used, and how and with whom that information might be shared. When was the last time you read the privacy policy of any technology tool, such as a Web browser or app? Do you think very many people actually read these? Do the disclaimers in these privacy polices give the offering organization the right to do anything with your information?



A privacy policy is a statement or legal document that discloses some or all the ways a party gathers, uses, discloses, and manages a customer or client’s data. It states how an individual’s information will be used. To be honest, I never read the policies of any technology tool and I don’t believe many people actually read these privacy policies. Accordingly, I believe that the policies do state that the related organization can use you information and once you sign it, indicated that you are agreed to it. A lot of the time, a company that in fact does use your information, explicitly defines the use within the policies that the consumer must agree to.  Social networking through websites and email has to be tracked anyway, so why wouldn’t a company that is forced legally to retain that information not use it to their advantage?


3.      What about location-based tracking in car systems like GM’s OnStar? Those systems know the car’s location to give you driving directions and perhaps identify local restaurants or other venues. Are you comfortable with this? When was the last time you bought a paper map? How much do you rely on your car’s GPS system?


In Malaysia, OnStar is not popular and frankly speaking that I totally have no idea about it. I searched thru the best tool, Google and found the information below. According to Google, OnStar systems have been proven to be extremely helpful in emergency situations. OnStar provides subscription based communications, in-vehicle security, hands free calling, turn-by-turn navigation and remote diagnostics systems which are very welcomed by U.S, Canada and China. A new aftermarket interior rear-view mirror with a built-in OnStar module, branded as OnStar FMV, became available to the public on July 24, 2011. It provides some of the features an OEM system has, such as Automatic Crash Response, Stolen Vehicle Tracking, Turn-by-Turn Navigation, and Roadside Assistance. Besides, drivers and passengers can use OnStar’s audio interface to contact OnStar representatives for emergency services, vehicle diagnostics and directions. However, in daily, it can be used to identify local restaurants or other venues as well. It will bring additional benefits to the users. If OnStar is available in Malaysia and I am not necessary to buy GM vehicles, I would find it useful and comfortable as it seems like an invisible body guard to me. However, a body guard could be hazardous to me also, if I am lucky enough to be targeted by someone doing bad thing.


4.      What about smartphone tracking for parents who want to know where their children are and where they’ve been? Minors under the age of 18 have very few privacy rights, especially when it comes to parents’ knowledge of where they are. Are parents going too far in wanting to know where their children are? What are the benefits of such systems for parents? For the children? What does the term “helicopter parent” refers to?



Parents nowadays have no difficulties or gap in knowing where is their children or where have been going to. It gives the authority to parents of monitoring the children. But however, in my opinion, I feel that a parent should use all the available resources to understand their children’s curiosities and be able to address them appropriately with ample knowledge.  By knowing where the children have gone to, the parents should not only forbid the children to go somewhere, but by telling them when is the right time to go. A parent can’t stop his children from going pub or karaoke while he is doing the same thing. However, the parents should spend more time with the children. For example, bringing them to travel during holidays or a small picnic gathering during weekends. Tracking system in smartphone has brought to the parents of monitoring but it does not bring family happiness. Hence, the parents should use the tracking system wisely and make improvement from it. From the searching result of Google, a helicopter parent is one that pays close attention to their children's experiences and problems socially and within their educational experience, similar to how a helicopter would hover.

Thursday, 17 April 2014

The Social Media Megaphone: Transparent Life Intensified


Q1: What do you think of Stacy Snyder’s story? Should she be denied a degree for publicly endorsing drinking to her underage student? To what extent do you believe that potential employers should explore social networking sites to validate the “goodness” of potential employees? Is there anything on your Facebook page that might turn off potential employers? If so, are you going to take any action?

As a teacher, Stacy Snyder shall maintain a positive, clean and serious image to her student.  This is because underage student will learn from teacher not only from the knowledge in the book but also from the attitude of the teacher. This is also applicable to parents. If teachers posting drinking photo in his/her social media, students might learn from what their teach doing but those underage might not know that drinking can be harmful if not being control. That is why I strongly agree that Stacy Snyder shall not post those misleading photo to her social media and I support the decision of the court.
                Besides, it is not a problem that employer viewing potential employee social networking as those posting in social networking is meant to be view. If the potential employee does not want others to view, he or she shall not post it in the first place. And it is always a better way for the employer to know the potential employee true character from social network rather than only base on observation  from few minutes interview. However, employer shall only take into account those good or bad characters that will influence the performance of the work and not just “everything”. This is because no one to be perfect in this world and everyone will have their freedom to do anything as long as it will not harm others.  Same goes back to Stacy Snyder’s story, if she is not a teacher but a IT programmer, it is not Human that the employer fire her just because of she is a drinker as long as this habit is not affecting her working performance.
                However, it is advisable that we carefully manage what we post in the social networking as this will definitely influence the first intense of others included potential employer. I seldom post any crazy or abnormal post to my social network. However, I will recheck again my social networking to make sure no any adverse news that will affected me to my next interview.

Q2: The webcasting of funerals is an interesting example of the flatness of the world. Is this an invasion of privacy or do next of kin have the right to make such a decision? What other significant events in a person’s life might be suitable for webcasting? Identify at least three such events and then do some research to determine if webcasting of those events is already taking place.

                Webcasting of the funeral have given a lot of benefit to the world. It helps friend and relative who is staying far or is too busy have a chance to view the funeral. I do not think that this is an invasion of privacy and next of kin have the right to make such decision as the funeral is done by the next of kin. Only if it is clearly stated in the will or any form from the dead that he/she do not want such funeral, who can proof that the dead do not want to be Webcasting or want to be webcasting?
                Besides funeral, We think that interview session is a good event that using webcasting. A normal interview session is face to face asking some question, and doing so question. This is all can be done by just using webcasting and this will save a lot of time as the interview can be done anytime and anywhere even the employer want to interview a talent from oversea, it can be done just by a single click. Most of the international corporation such as Google and yahoo has used this method to hired talent from every country.
Studying in class room and in a fix time might not be effective to certain people. To solve this kind of problem, we suggest that school can have webcasting session in their lecturing time. This can make sure the lecturing being recorded down and student can review back what had been teaching in the class room.
                Further more, webcasting also suitable to be used in Marriage ceremony/ dinner. This is to let those who could not attend the ceremony/ dinner has a change to see the event thru online. Those who watch online also can give their bless o the new marriage couple thru online. A lot of western country has used this method in their marriage ceremony and a lot of positive feedbacks have been given.

Q3: Osama Bin Laden represents a very dark image for most Americans. His participation in the planning of the September 11th attacks will forever mark him as evil. Should people, like Rashard Mendenhall, who make positive or perhaps even neutral comments about terrorist like Bin Laden be fired from endorsement contracts? Can making such comments be considered grounds for termination of employment? Maybe dismissal from your school as a student?
In this world, everyone shall have freedom of speak no matter you are workers or students. This is because we are not slave. However, we shall always be responsible to what we talk. We shall always avoid to talk something that will hurt others feeling. Although it is not wrong to have a idea of neutral comments about terrorist like Bin Laden, this will hurt a lot of people who lost their family in that attack. And it is always not to be good to support terrorist activity; this will let other misunderstanding you to be one of the terrorist. However, similar to question 1, unless his ability to work has been affected, the company shall only give him warning about what he comments or do investigation about his background. Or unless Rashard Mendenhall being confirm as a terrorist, he shall not be fired from endorsement contracts. Same as student, it is not HUMAN if such student being terminate from study just because he/she has give support to terrorist. The student shall be teaching correctly for not supporting terrorist rather than chasing away the chances to correct their mind set. Dismissal from school will just helping the world to create a new terrorist.

Q4: Very few people would question the service and commitment of military personnel to our country. The two sergeants who created the YouTube video openly criticized Delta Airlines for its charging of baggage fees to military personnel. Is this open form of criticism of businesses and their practices acceptable? Will it help businesses be more accountable to customer?
 
Consumer view should be the priority to be considered in any business decision. We strongly agree of using the social media to give comment on business decision. Only when there is criticism, there is improvement. Consumer can give their feedback either support or disagree in social media and business management shall grab such data to evaluate the successfulness of the strategy used. If there is a lot of negative news, company could restructure their strategy to suit the situation. This definitely helps businesses be more accountable to customer.
 
Q5: The use of Facebook (or any other social networking site) can truly make a person’s life transparent, available for the whole world to see. Should there be legislation regulating the openness of your life in internet? Can we expect society somehow to regulate this without any laws?

                The use of Facebook (or any other social networking site) can just let other to see what u hope they to see. It not really can let your life to be transparent. You are still who you are in the reality (at least with current technology), but you have given others a lot of chances to know where were you and what you have.  You should not do so. Although law shall not be enforcing to prohibit anyone to be open in their life in internet, teaching will do. The knowledge of dangerous that will occur if someone misused or carelessly used of social media shall be given to public and by having human governance, I believe that society somehow could regulate themselves without any laws being enforce.

Tuesday, 8 April 2014

BK Lim

MY BIO-DATA


  • Name : Lim Biing Kun
  • Age : 28
  • DOB : 26 Sep 1986
  • E-mail : mis.gm05168@gmail.com
  • Matrix no: GM05168